One of the things that annoys me about the Mail reader most (and also the writers due to it not being an accident) is their inability to read the crummy outrage-inducing articles properly and go straight into NIMBY alert. This is aided by the usual Mail writer tools of quotation marks around words and phrases that are known to not be proper facts and the use of the popular “I reckon” rentaquote folks to go from point A (the fact) to point D (the “I reckon D will happen because A did”) bypassing points B and C all together. A good example appeared today in a story about how a council is trialing a system where households who reduce their non-recyclable waste could be rewarded, which ended up as a Nu-LieBore want to stealth tax us nice middle class people for emptying our kitchen bins ZOMG!” :

The first pay-as-you-throw rubbish scheme is to be launched this year, raising fears of nationwide bin taxes. Under the controversial plans, binmen will weigh each household’s weekly rubbish, with the council paying cash ‘rewards’ to the least wasteful homes. Town hall chiefs say the scheme is designed to encourage green behaviour. And they insist those who continue to fill their dustbins will not be fined.
But critics say the pilot will lead to a system of rubbish incentives and fines in which large families pay more to have their bins emptied and electronic microchip ‘spies’ are placed in every wheelie bin.
Who are these handy critics? Apart from The Mail…
Liberal Democrat-run Bristol City Council is applying to the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs for permission to trial a voluntary scheme. Under the local authority’s plans, residents of 2,362 homes in the city will be invited to take part in a sixmonth pilot. Volunteers will be given a microchipped wheelie bin so the amount they throw out can be weighed and recorded, and the amount of waste per person calculated. Residents will get cash payments depending on how much they manage to reduce their waste.
Gary Hopkins, the council’s environment spokesman, said: ‘The scheme will encourage residents to think about what they are throwing away and act as a thank you to those who help us by reducing their waste. It will be completely voluntary, so people only sign up to it if they want to take part. There will be no penalty for participants who don’t manage to reduce their waste.’
So far so good. This sounds like a sensible idea to anyone concerned about wastage, landfills and the cost of getting rid of all that rubbish, right?
The Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council is already running a scheme in which residents are rewarded for recycling with vouchers they can spend in local stores. The Tory authority won the backing of David Cameron for its incentive scheme. But if Bristol gets the go-ahead, it will be the first council to provide cash incentives for those who cut the amount of rubbish they send to landfill.
So no Labour councils have been involved so far? OK. Glad that is clear.
The Conservatives’ local government spokesman Caroline Spelman said: ‘There’s a clear benefit in piloting genuine rewards in voluntary schemes to help people go green. However, Labour ministers are still planning to impose bin taxes in any Labour fourth term, despite the unwillingness of councils to play ball. Labour intend to impose bin taxes through back-door routes such as unelected Joint Waste Authorities and making them compulsory in so-called eco-towns.’
She reckons.
Dare we look at the readers’ comments?

I blame Liebore for people not being able to read simple stories.

Too true, the readers did not like this comment.

It’s a well known fact that there were death camps for people who were bad at recycling during World War 2. Yes.

I can only conclude that they are happy being wilfully ignorant lazy fuckers which is a shame.

Tax Payers Association must have been on holiday… but guess who’s paying for it?

OK. I shall stop right now.